Building a first version
You want to make the big decisions now, before more code is built on top of them.
We check how your software is built, point out what could go wrong, and help you decide what to fix first and what can wait.
You may not need one. These are the moments when a second pair of eyes helps most.
You want to make the big decisions now, before more code is built on top of them.
New customers and features are showing the limits of how it was built.
You are planning a big launch, a move to new systems, or a way to keep each customer's data separate.
It depends on your product and what we can access. We agree the exact list before we start.
| Area | What we check |
|---|---|
| The big picture | The main parts of your software, how they depend on each other, and why they were built that way |
| Customer data | Whether each customer's data is kept apart, where that matters |
| Who can do what | Roles and access rules, and whether they are checked everywhere |
| The behind-the-scenes part | The most important flows, the outside tools you connect to, and what happens when something fails |
| Speed | What is likely to slow down, based on the numbers we can get |
| How easy it is to change | Parts that are tangled together, risky dependencies, and what future changes will cost |
| Servers and cloud setup | How it is released, how you would spot problems, and what could cause an outage |
Every review is tailored to your product. We don't dig into every area every time.
A review is not a full code check, a hacking test, a stress test or a certificate, unless we agree to include one.
Three products, three different problems. Each case study explains what we decided and why.
Software for salon chains.
Online learning software used by several colleges.
An online store with a growing catalogue.
We confirm timing and fees once we know what is being reviewed. We don't quote before we understand the job.
We learn about your product, your worries and your goals.
We agree what we will look at, what access we need, what you will get, and what is not included.
We look at the agreed parts of your software and the evidence behind them.
We explain the risks, the trade-offs and what to do first.
You fix things yourself, or talk to us about helping.
Rajesh Ayyavu founded Tenlyr. He leads the first conversation and does the review. There is no sales handoff.
If you ask us to do the fixing afterwards, that is agreed separately. Tenlyr's engineers do the work, and Rajesh stays responsible for it.
Both. For a first version, we focus on decisions that are costly to undo later. For an existing product, we focus on what is already under strain.
It depends on what we agree. Some reviews use a walkthrough, diagrams and documents. Others need read-only access to code, settings or numbers. We agree this before we start.
We cover the areas we agree together. We don't include a full code check, a hacking test, a stress test or a certificate unless we agree to add one.
Only if the evidence says so. Most findings are targeted fixes. If a rewrite really is the honest answer, we will say so and explain the trade-offs.
Yes. We write the findings so your team can act on them without us. If you want our help, that is agreed separately.
Before we start, we agree what we can see and how it is shared. We are happy to sign an NDA.
We talk through the findings on a call. Then you decide: act on your own, or talk to us about more help.
We only ask what we need to see whether a review makes sense. Rajesh reads every request himself.
Rajesh will read what you sent and reply by email.